NaturalNews) While all eyes were on Hurricane Sandy in the days leading up to the storm's breach on the mainland of the Northeast, the White House was busy devising new ways to enslave Americans under the guise of protecting national security. On October 26, 2012, Barack Obama quietly signed an Executive Order (EO) establishing the so-called Homeland Security Partnership Council, a public-private partnership that basically merges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with local governments and the private sector for the implied purpose of giving the Executive Branch complete and limitless control over the American people.
Just before Hurricane Sandy, Obama signed executive order merging Homeland Security with private sector to create virtual dictatorship
One of the most effective ways by which
the federal government has been able to spread its tendrils into every
level of state, regional, and local governments in years past has been
to continually convince the people that terrorism lurks around every
corner, and that the federal government is needed to provide safety.
This, of course, is how blatantly unconstitutional provisions like the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) were able to get passed with relative ease -- without these
draconian expansions of federal control over American affairs, the
terrorists will win, we were all told.
White House forming nationwide secret police to monitor lives of Americans
This is precisely the angle being taken with the new EO, except it goes even further in conflating federal power structures with local governments and the private sector. Based on the eery language contained in the EO, the federal government appears ready to begin rapidly expanding its command and control operations at the local level by establishing a vast network of homeland security "partnerships" throughout the country, which will be tasked with reporting back to the central command center and feeding "intelligence" information as requested by federal officials."[W]e must tap the ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships with the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and community-based organizations," says the EO. It goes on to add that the merger between the federal government and the private sector is necessary to facilitate the government's desire to better "address homeland security priorities," which includes things like "responding to natural disasters ... (and) preventing terrorism by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and resources."
An official Steering Committee will be established with representatives from virtually every single three and four-letter federal agency, and this committee will be guided by a separate council on how to best incorporate the federal government and DHS into every nook and cranny of American society. Once established, this council will maintain control over presumably all aspects of society by overseeing a secret police force comprised of spies from schools, community groups, churches, and various other local institutions.
"[W]e must institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats to the United States," adds the ominous EO, which was flown under the radar of the mainstream media.
You can read the complete EO for yourself at: http://www.whitehouse.gov
Insider: Obama Team to Incite Race Riots; Use White Guilt in 2012 Election
|
Divide et ImperaSince riots and uprisings are now en vogue the world over and with signs that they will soon reach the shores of America, would it be that much of a stretch to suggest President Obama’s election campaign would be willing to incite race riots in the hopes of guilting white Americans into casting a vote for a President who is progressively losing popularity and support at an ever accelerating rate?
[divide and conquer; divide and rule]
In politics and sociology, divide and rule (also known as divide and conquer) is a combination of political, military and economic strategy of gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into chunks that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy. The concept refers to a strategy that breaks up existing power structures and prevents smaller power groups from linking up.
The White House Insider, reportedly a disgruntled democrat operative deep inside the administration, tells all in a recent three part interview with the Ulsterman Report. While the claims sound particularly outrageous, plenty of Presidents past have taken extreme measures to secure their electability and preserve their image. The “Insider” has been uncanny in predicting events over the last 18 months, including the extension of the Bush tax cuts, the public outing of operation Gunrunner, the birth certificate issue going fully mainstream, Democrat party infighting between the President and members of Congress, and White House attrition resulting from discontent. For this reason we will, at the very least, bring this latest Insider report to our readers for digestion.
**Adult content and expletives**A politician, especially at the highest levels, will stop at nothing to maintain their power. President Obama is no different, and considering that mouthpieces in his administration have repeatedly referred to unsupportive segments of the electorate as terrorists and racists, is it any wonder they are considering this strategy?
Ulsterman: How? What’s the plan? What’s going to be different from all the other campaigns?
Insider: You’ve already seen it. A taste of it. Race. The race card. Racism. Race-race-race. It’s all they fucking got to run on these days.
Ulsterman: Race? Hasn’t Obama played that one out already? It’s become a joke.
Insider: Played it out? No, not…you might think so but no…his people are going to raise the issue of race to a level this country hasn’t seen since the Civil Rights movement. White guilt got Barack Obama the nomination. White guilt got Barack Obama into the White House. At least it was a big part of it…they are not sure they can run on the economy by summer of 2012. Motivation is way down – the people on the ground. Many of them will be sitting this one out. The campaign conducted over five internals in the last few months. Each time the one issue that came back favorably for the president was the color of his skin. People are not comfortable…white people are not comfortable going against a person of color. At least not a whole lot of them. Those studies – those kinds of studies…they were first incorporated by the Hillary campaign back in 2007 and 2008. It scared the hell out of her – she was so afraid of being called a racist. So she attacked Obama on his lack of experience, she just touched on some of the Chicago garbage…but in the end, the race issue kept her from really engaging in all out political war. The Clinton machine was handcuffed. When Obama used race to get America to forgive the fact he spent some 20 years sitting in the church of a proven anti-American fascist fucking racist – what could they do? It was game over.
…
Insider: Yes. It’s in place and underway – being developed. Further developed. It’s gonna – gonna tie it in with the unions somehow. I don’t know exaclty how – just that’s included in it. It will be an all out campaign on race. The goal is to completely mobilize the Black vote while shaming an even greater number of white voters into not opposing a second Obama term. They are gonna get out the guilt vote man. The guilt vote!
Ulsterman: Obama…Democrats in general, already get the Black vote – most of it.
Insider: They want all of it. Every last one. Then bring in the Hispanic vote, tie them up in this race issue as well. Republicans want to toss you out. Obama wants to bring you in. They hate the color of Obama’s skin just like they hate the color of yours. Hey White America, you aren’t part of that group who hates non-whites are you? If not, you better get out and vote for Barack Obama.
Ulsterman: That sounds overly simplistic and insulting to voters. You really think something like that would actually work?
Insider: Hell yes-yes… it can work. It’s not gonna come so easy as it did in 2008, but that’s why they plan to ramp it up – the race issue.
Does anyone expect the President to successfully run on the economy, health care, tax cuts, or budget reductions?
It seems to us that his options are quite limited.
This means that we can soon expect agents provocateurs to embed themselves into Republican and Democrat Party rallies and campaign events. There will be no shortage of media coverage, and we can fully expect a progressively-leaning media to inflame and incite such events (remember the spitting incident on the steps of Capitol Hill?).
The argument that the next round of riots coming to America will be organized by our very own elected officials using pretexts such as race and class warfare is quite compelling considering the circumstances.
Executive Order -- Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
ESTABLISHING THE WHITE HOUSE
HOMELAND SECURITY PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, and in order to advance the
Federal Government's use of local partnerships to address homeland
security challenges, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. The purpose of this order is to
maximize the Federal Government's ability to develop local partnerships
in the United States to support homeland security priorities.
Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals,
structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are
mutually determined. Collaboration enables the Federal Government and
its partners to use resources more efficiently, build on one another's
expertise, drive innovation, engage in collective action, broaden
investments to achieve shared goals, and improve performance.
Partnerships enhance our ability to address homeland security
priorities, from responding to natural disasters to preventing
terrorism, by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and
resources.
The National Security Strategy emphasizes the importance of
partnerships, underscoring that to keep our Nation safe "we must tap the
ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships with the
private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and
community-based organizations. Such partnerships are critical to U.S.
success at home and abroad, and we will support them through enhanced
opportunities for engagement, coordination, transparency, and
information sharing." This approach recognizes that, given the
complexities and range of challenges, we must institutionalize an
all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats to the United
States.
Sec. 2. White House Homeland Security Partnership Council and Steering Committee.
(a) White House Homeland Security Partnership Council. There is
established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council
(Council) to foster local partnerships -- between the Federal Government
and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations,
community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial
government and law enforcement -- to address homeland security
challenges. The Council shall be chaired by the Assistant to the
President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism (Chair), or a
designee from the National Security Staff.
(b) Council Membership.
(i) Pursuant to the nomination process established in subsection
(b)(ii) of this section, the Council shall be composed of Federal
officials who are from field offices of the executive departments,
agencies, and bureaus (agencies) that are members of the Steering
Committee established in subsection (c) of this section, and who have
demonstrated an ability to develop, sustain, and institutionalize local
partnerships to address policy priorities.
(ii) The nomination process and selection criteria for members of the
Council shall be established by the Steering Committee. Based on those
criteria, agency heads may select and present to the Steering Committee
their nominee or nominees to represent them on the Council. The Steering
Committee shall consider all of the nominees and decide by consensus
which of the nominees shall participate on the Council. Each member
agency on the Steering Committee, with the exception of the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence, may have at least one
representative on the Council.
(c) Steering Committee. There is also established a Steering
Committee, chaired by the Chair of the Council, to provide guidance to
the Council and perform other functions as set forth in this order. The
Steering Committee shall include a representative at the Deputy agency
head level, or that representative's designee, from the following
agencies:
(i) Department of State;
(ii) Department of the Treasury;
(iii) Department of Defense;
(iv) Department of Justice;
(v) Department of the Interior;
(vi) Department of Agriculture;
(vii) Department of Commerce;
(viii) Department of Labor;
(ix) Department of Health and Human Services;
(x) Department of Housing and Urban Development;
(xi) Department of Transportation;
(xii) Department of Energy;
(xiii) Department of Education;
(xiv) Department of Veterans Affairs;
(xv) Department of Homeland Security;
(xvi) Office of the Director of National Intelligence;
(xvii) Environmental Protection Agency;
(xviii) Small Business Administration; and
(xix) Federal Bureau of Investigation.
At the invitation of the Chair, representatives of agencies not listed
in subsection (c) of this section or other executive branch entities may
attend and participate in Steering Committee meetings as appropriate.
(d) Administration. The Chair or a designee shall convene
meetings of the Council and Steering Committee, determine their agendas,
and coordinate their work. The Council may establish subgroups
consisting exclusively of Council members or their designees, as
appropriate.
Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee. (a) The Council shall, consistent with guidance from the Steering Committee:
(i) advise the Chair and Steering Committee members on priorities,
challenges, and opportunities for local partnerships to support homeland
security priorities, as well as regularly report to the Steering
Committee on the Council's efforts;
(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for
collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local,
tribal, and territorial stakeholders;
(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial
stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local
homeland security partnerships;
(iv) raise awareness of local partnership best practices that can support homeland security priorities;
(v) as appropriate, conduct outreach to representatives of the private
sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based
organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and
law enforcement entities with relevant expertise for local homeland
security partnerships, and collaborate with other Federal Government
bodies; and
(vi) convene an annual meeting to exchange key findings, progress, and best practices.
(b) The Steering Committee shall:
(i) determine the scope of issue areas the Council will address and its
operating protocols, in consultation with the Office of Management and
Budget;
(ii) establish the nomination process and selection criteria for
members of the Council as set forth in section 2(b)(ii) of this order;
(iii) provide guidance to the Council on the activities set forth in subsection (a) of this section; and
(iv) within 1 year of the selection of the Council members, and
annually thereafter, provide a report on the work of the Council to the
President through the Chair.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) The heads of
agencies participating in the Steering Committee shall assist and
provide information to the Council, consistent with applicable law, as
may be necessary to implement this order. Each agency shall bear its own
expense for participating in the Council.
(b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof;
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals;
or
(iii) the functions of the Overseas Security Advisory Council.
(c) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
appropriate protections for privacy and civil liberties, and subject to
the availability of appropriations.
(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or
benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by
any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or
entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK OBAMA
No comments:
Post a Comment